Report finds Calgary a luxury home mecca
Baseline entry point is $2M for upscale residence
By Mario Toneguzzi
Calgary Herald April 22, 2013
Calgary is one of Canada's most robust markets for luxury homes, says a report by Sotheby's International Realty Canada.
The baseline entry point for a luxury single-family home in Calgary is $2 million - in line with the Toronto market - says Sotheby's Top Tier Trends Report.
As Calgary's market for top-tier homes continues to outpace most of Canada, Sotheby's survey findings reveal demand is predominantly driven by younger buyers, age 35 to 40, who have a skew in preference toward inner-city and Beltline living.
The report lists the most desirable neighbourhoods as Mount Royal, Brittania, Bel-Aire, Aspen, Springbank Hill, Elbow Park/Elbow Valley, and Inner City Southwest/ Westside
"According to agents surveyed, top-tier single-family homes start at $2 million dollars with a minimum of 3,500 square feet," the report states. "According to experts surveyed, over 80 per cent of these homebuyers earn an income of $500,000 or higher.
"They are predominantly employed within the finance and investment banking (mining, oil and gas) or medical sectors, or are entrepreneurs," the report continues.
According to the survey, 85 per cent of luxury home purchases in Calgary are made by Canadians - the highest rate among the markets Sotheby's surveyed.
"According to agents surveyed, top-tier single-family homes start at $2 million dollars with a minimum of 3,500 square feet," said the report. "'Must-have' features include access to schools and shopping, views of downtown, park, river or mountains," the report says.
"Most buyers own multiple homes and mortgages are commonly used within this segment of the market."
According to the Calgary Real Estate Board, there have been 204 MLS sales over $1 million in Calgary this year to April 17.
The city set a record for luxury home sales during 2012, with 544 sales. The previous record was 458, set in 2007.
Richard Cho, senior market analyst in Calgary for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., said that demand for luxury homes has been robust.
"Low mortgage rates combined with a healthy selection of higher-priced homes have also helped luxury homebuyers."
Thursday, April 25, 2013
CALGARY TOPS
Calgary tops global list for real estate performance
Total annual return on investment of 19%
By Mario Toneguzzi
Calgary Herald April 19, 2013
CALGARY — Calgary’s commercial real estate market was the best performing one in 2012 among 32 cities analyzed in a report by the Investment Property Databank.
Calgary’s total annual return on investment was 19.0 per cent, outperforming San Francisco (18.0 per cent), Houston (16.0 per cent) and Perth (13.7 per cent).
In 2011, Calgary’s return of 21.6 per cent was also best among 60 international cities surveyed by the IPD.
Labels:
Calgary,
Commercial,
Houston,
Investment Property Databank,
IPD,
Perth,
Real Estate,
San Francisco
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
ON THE HUNT
Get ready condo flippers, Canada Revenue Agency is hunting you
By Garry Marr
Financial Post April 20, 2013
You just sold your condo, you made a hefty profit and know you have to pay your taxes.
The bill might be more than you think.
If it’s your principal residence, there’s no tax, as long as you have the paperwork to prove it. The Canada Revenue Agency is taking a closer look at the condominium sector in what some in the industry have dubbed the “Condo Project.”
Even if you own up to it being an investment property, you may not be allowed the capital gains tax break and that means a bigger hunk of your profit going to Ottawa.
Let’s say your gain is $100,000 and your tax bracket is 46%. Capital gains are taxed at 50% so you would only owe $23,000 on that profit.
Not so fast! If the CRA says you are in the business of flipping condominiums, get ready to pay based on the gain being counted as income for a tax bill of twice the amount at $46,000. And, it gets worse. You could also face a fine of up to 50% of the tax owed for making a false disclosure.
With the deadline for filing taxes coming up April 30, you might want to think very carefully about how you record that housing sale you made in 2012.
Sam Papadopoulous, senior public affairs advisor-manager with CRA’s Ontario region, acknowledges that the strength of the condo sector has attracted the attention of the taxman.
“We do from time to time target some sectors more closely than others,” he said. “We look at the real estate market in general. Of course, [there is more focus], it’s a hot market.”
People in the industry have a different view.
Some suggest it fits in with the recent budget when Jim Flaherty, the finance minister, announced his government was taking a closer look at loopholes and tax cheats — hoping to shrink its deficit in the process.
One of the issues attracting the attention of the CRA is assignment clauses, where one person agrees to purchase a condo before it is built but ultimately sells his or her right to buy that condo before the building is even registered.
Builders usually collect a fee for that privilege but ultimately when title is registered at the land registry office the original purchaser’s name is nowhere to be found.
While most builders are unlikely to voluntarily supply a list of properties in their building that were assigned, they could be forced to cough it up if they are audited by the CRA.
Those people who have assigned their units to another buyer are going to be hard pressed to prove they planned to use the unit as an investment property rather just flipping — meaning the CRA is highly unlikely to allow them to count money made at the lower capital gains rate.
“If you keep [assigning property] then it is not capital gains, that’s trade and that’s income,” said Mr. Papadopoulous, adding you do it a “couple of times” and it’s income. “Of course, that’s part of [what they are investigating].”
The warning to people flipping property and thinking they can get away without reporting the gain is pretty clear.
“We live in the information technology age,” said Mr. Papadopoulous, who wouldn’t get into how CRA is tracking down the tax evaders. “We are putting our resources to work and following the trail where we can.”
Robert Kepes, a Toronto tax lawyer at Morris Kepes Winters, said he’s seen the CRA go after people who have been living in a property and still question it as a principal residence.
CRA starts with a letter to a taxpayer asking them for details about when and why they sold their property and people often fill out the questionnaire without legal advice.
The issue goes all the way back to 1971 when there was no tax at all on capital gains so everybody tried to avoid counting gains as income.
Mr. Kepes says the distinction between income and capital is as simple as the difference between a tree and the fruit that it bears.
“The tree is capital and it produces a fruit and the income is the profit that is derived when that fruit is sold,” he says.
If your condo is that tree and your rental income is the fruit and you make a profit from that rental income, that’s taxed as full income. You eventually sell the tree for more money and that’s just a capital gain, taxed at the 50% rate.
If your entire businesses is just trading trees and not producing fruit, that’s business income.
“The Income Tax Act asks what was your intention when you bought that condo,” said Mr. Kepes. “These principles are easy to describe but harder to prove in fact.”
The law is like a civil case, a judge doesn’t have to believe you beyond a reasonable doubt, but a judge does have to conclude you are more believable than the CRA.
“We have to bring all kinds of intrinsic evidence,” says Mr. Kepes, noting some clients will produce something as simple as a change in address on their driver’s licence to show they were using their condo as a principal residence.
If you never actually moved into the condo, it’s going to be tough to prove that it was principal residence.
You may never have produced income from the profit but that’s not to say you didn’t plan to, so perhaps you could get the capital gains exemption.
“The question can be ‘how did they come to sell the property,’” said Mr. Kepes, adding the CRA might look at whether you were advertising the property for sale.
Brian Johnston, chief operating officer of Mattamy Corp., says the CRA has ways to get information on sales.
“They audit real estate companies, look at the name on the contract and look at the final deed and see a difference,” said Mr. Johnston. “They see Bill Smith bought it and Joe Blow is on the deed. They want to know how this happened and follow the paper trail.”
He has some sympathy for consumers confused about the whole process.
“I think the government should make it a little simpler in terms of filing for principle residence exemption,” said Mr. Johnston. “It’s a real gray area of the law. The government has not done a good job for Canadians trying to specifically identify all the rules around [selling homes and paying taxes]. People might have inadvertently made mistakes.”
Condominium developer Brad Lamb, who has been audited several times, said ultimately it’s better to be more conservative when you’re filing — meaning just count the gain as income if you are in doubt.
“If you are prolific buyer or seller of properties, whether it’s condos or not, you have to govern yourself accordingly. If you don’t, you’ll get caught and be fined,” said Mr. Lamb. “I decided many years ago when I started buying condominiums, after talking with my accountant, you can pay [lower tax] or you can fight 50 years with Revenue Canada.”
http://business.financialpost.com/2013/04/20/get-ready-to-pay-income-tax-on-your-condo-profit/
By Garry Marr
Financial Post April 20, 2013
You just sold your condo, you made a hefty profit and know you have to pay your taxes.
The bill might be more than you think.
If it’s your principal residence, there’s no tax, as long as you have the paperwork to prove it. The Canada Revenue Agency is taking a closer look at the condominium sector in what some in the industry have dubbed the “Condo Project.”
Even if you own up to it being an investment property, you may not be allowed the capital gains tax break and that means a bigger hunk of your profit going to Ottawa.
Let’s say your gain is $100,000 and your tax bracket is 46%. Capital gains are taxed at 50% so you would only owe $23,000 on that profit.
Not so fast! If the CRA says you are in the business of flipping condominiums, get ready to pay based on the gain being counted as income for a tax bill of twice the amount at $46,000. And, it gets worse. You could also face a fine of up to 50% of the tax owed for making a false disclosure.
With the deadline for filing taxes coming up April 30, you might want to think very carefully about how you record that housing sale you made in 2012.
Sam Papadopoulous, senior public affairs advisor-manager with CRA’s Ontario region, acknowledges that the strength of the condo sector has attracted the attention of the taxman.
“We do from time to time target some sectors more closely than others,” he said. “We look at the real estate market in general. Of course, [there is more focus], it’s a hot market.”
People in the industry have a different view.
Some suggest it fits in with the recent budget when Jim Flaherty, the finance minister, announced his government was taking a closer look at loopholes and tax cheats — hoping to shrink its deficit in the process.
One of the issues attracting the attention of the CRA is assignment clauses, where one person agrees to purchase a condo before it is built but ultimately sells his or her right to buy that condo before the building is even registered.
Builders usually collect a fee for that privilege but ultimately when title is registered at the land registry office the original purchaser’s name is nowhere to be found.
While most builders are unlikely to voluntarily supply a list of properties in their building that were assigned, they could be forced to cough it up if they are audited by the CRA.
Those people who have assigned their units to another buyer are going to be hard pressed to prove they planned to use the unit as an investment property rather just flipping — meaning the CRA is highly unlikely to allow them to count money made at the lower capital gains rate.
“If you keep [assigning property] then it is not capital gains, that’s trade and that’s income,” said Mr. Papadopoulous, adding you do it a “couple of times” and it’s income. “Of course, that’s part of [what they are investigating].”
The warning to people flipping property and thinking they can get away without reporting the gain is pretty clear.
“We live in the information technology age,” said Mr. Papadopoulous, who wouldn’t get into how CRA is tracking down the tax evaders. “We are putting our resources to work and following the trail where we can.”
Robert Kepes, a Toronto tax lawyer at Morris Kepes Winters, said he’s seen the CRA go after people who have been living in a property and still question it as a principal residence.
CRA starts with a letter to a taxpayer asking them for details about when and why they sold their property and people often fill out the questionnaire without legal advice.
The issue goes all the way back to 1971 when there was no tax at all on capital gains so everybody tried to avoid counting gains as income.
Mr. Kepes says the distinction between income and capital is as simple as the difference between a tree and the fruit that it bears.
“The tree is capital and it produces a fruit and the income is the profit that is derived when that fruit is sold,” he says.
If your condo is that tree and your rental income is the fruit and you make a profit from that rental income, that’s taxed as full income. You eventually sell the tree for more money and that’s just a capital gain, taxed at the 50% rate.
If your entire businesses is just trading trees and not producing fruit, that’s business income.
“The Income Tax Act asks what was your intention when you bought that condo,” said Mr. Kepes. “These principles are easy to describe but harder to prove in fact.”
The law is like a civil case, a judge doesn’t have to believe you beyond a reasonable doubt, but a judge does have to conclude you are more believable than the CRA.
“We have to bring all kinds of intrinsic evidence,” says Mr. Kepes, noting some clients will produce something as simple as a change in address on their driver’s licence to show they were using their condo as a principal residence.
If you never actually moved into the condo, it’s going to be tough to prove that it was principal residence.
You may never have produced income from the profit but that’s not to say you didn’t plan to, so perhaps you could get the capital gains exemption.
“The question can be ‘how did they come to sell the property,’” said Mr. Kepes, adding the CRA might look at whether you were advertising the property for sale.
Brian Johnston, chief operating officer of Mattamy Corp., says the CRA has ways to get information on sales.
“They audit real estate companies, look at the name on the contract and look at the final deed and see a difference,” said Mr. Johnston. “They see Bill Smith bought it and Joe Blow is on the deed. They want to know how this happened and follow the paper trail.”
He has some sympathy for consumers confused about the whole process.
“I think the government should make it a little simpler in terms of filing for principle residence exemption,” said Mr. Johnston. “It’s a real gray area of the law. The government has not done a good job for Canadians trying to specifically identify all the rules around [selling homes and paying taxes]. People might have inadvertently made mistakes.”
Condominium developer Brad Lamb, who has been audited several times, said ultimately it’s better to be more conservative when you’re filing — meaning just count the gain as income if you are in doubt.
“If you are prolific buyer or seller of properties, whether it’s condos or not, you have to govern yourself accordingly. If you don’t, you’ll get caught and be fined,” said Mr. Lamb. “I decided many years ago when I started buying condominiums, after talking with my accountant, you can pay [lower tax] or you can fight 50 years with Revenue Canada.”
http://business.financialpost.com/2013/04/20/get-ready-to-pay-income-tax-on-your-condo-profit/
Labels:
Calgary,
Canada,
Canada Revenue Agency,
Capital Gains,
Condo Project,
CRA,
Flippers,
Hunt,
Ottawa,
Real Estate,
Tax,
Taxes
Friday, April 12, 2013
MONDO CONDO
Pace increases for condo sales
By Josh Skapin
Calgary Herald April 11, 2013
Sales of resale condos were on the upswing in March compared to a year earlier, says the Calgary Real Estate Board.
Sales climbed to 630 deals, up 6.6 per cent from 591 transactions during the same month last year.
Townhomes led the charge in sales with 283 moves after 235 units changed hands a year earlier, marking a 20 per cent change.
That came with a 10.3 per cent climb in new listings with 395 after there were 358 last March.
The apartment market, on the other hand, saw little change, easing 2.5 per cent.
“The condominium apartment market remains in balance,” says CREB chief economist Ann-Marie Lurie, in a news release.
Last month 347 apartments were sold after 356 deals during the same time in 2012.
New listings of apartments eased 13 per cent at 560 after there were 644 during the same time last year.
“While it has moved to the lower end of the spectrum, it remains better supplied than the single-family market and the majority of product available is in an affordable price range,” says Lurie.
While condo apartments dipped in sales, the benchmark price went up six per cent. The benchmark price is that of a typical home based on a formula that uses various factors to ensure accurate comparisons.
For condo apartments, the benchmark price was $257,700 last month, up six per cent from $243,000 a year earlier.
The townhome benchmark price also increased last month compared to a year earlier.
It reached $286,800 for a four per cent step up from $274,600 this time in 2012.
A TEXTBOOK MARKET?
What happened to the expected Alberta real estate boom?
Market influencers tempering demand
By Mario Toneguzzi
Calgary Herald April 11, 2013
CALGARY — Several ‘market influencers’ have kept the reins on the expected Alberta real estate boom, says a new report on the housing market.
The report, by Don Campbell, senior analyst and founding partner of the Real Estate Investment Network, said debate is raging about why the market isn’t booming like it did in 2006 and 2007 when the job market and population in the province were growing at the same rates as they are today.
“The real difference this time is hidden in the strong forces of today’s market influencers. It is very true that the market drivers are all in place to support a large growth in housing purchase demand and price increases, in fact it is a textbook market for a boom,” said Campbell.
“In Alberta, the GDP and job growth have driven very strong population growth which has led to low vacancy rates not experienced in this province for many years. Street rents are jumping due to the rental supply/demand inequality. So, on the surface that means Alberta should be experiencing another one of those unsustainable booms. Well why isn’t it? And is there one still in the works?”
He said certain wild cards can throw a market off its prescribed cycle for periods of time.
“So, despite all of the market drivers being in place to push the Alberta real estate market into its next boom cycle the market continues to underperform its economics. Why? Simply, there are market influencers in play and that is why we are not yet seeing the expected rush into the market demand,” he said.
They include the once-bitten, twice-shy attitude equating into a local lack of confidence in the market. Many Albertans made their first home purchases during the previous boom. They were hit hard when the financial crash came. This has tempered enthusiasm for the market now.
Tighter mortgage qualification rules have also tempered market demand.
Overall consumer confidence in real estate is taking a hit with many recent reports and headlines on the state of the Canadian market saying it may be over-priced or overvalued.
A large portion of Alberta population growth is from two key demographics who are less likely to buy a house immediately — immigrants and ‘Echo-boomers’.
According to the Calgary Real Estate Board, total MLS sales year-to-date in the city until April 10 were 5,798 transactions, up 3.72 per cent compared with the same period last year.
The average sale price this year has risen by 8.08 per cent to $451,246 while the median price is up by 5.92 per cent to $397,000.
Ann-Marie Lurie, CREB’s chief economist, said the organization never felt the economy was about to boom, based on several factors.
“The first consideration is the economy,” she said. “In the 2005-2007 period, we had significant growth in both the oil and natural gas sector, economic growth as of late has only been driven by the oil sector. While this has helped support growth, there have been some challenges regarding bottlenecks and price discounts which has impacted employment growth prospects in the province. We also shouldn’t forget that the natural gas market continues to struggle. Our economic growth is progressing but at a slower pace, and forecasters also estimated that employment growth and net migration would ease this year, two factors pointing towards slower demand growth in housing.
“The next consideration is fundamentals in the housing market. Inventory levels were generally more elevated in the resale market, and it has taken some time to absorb some of the excess in the market. While this has occurred primarily in the single-family market, it has only started to spillover into the surrounding areas, the condominium market, and the new home market. When considering all the options available to consumers, there was sufficient choice to prevent any significant shortage in the entire housing market, which was the case in 2006-2007, causing a unsustainable jump in home prices.”
She said she is not surprised that the market didn’t boom, given the economic backdrop and current supply in the market.
Lai Sing Louie, regional economist for the Prairies and Territories for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., said market conditions in Alberta’s housing markets today are different from the boom.
“Some of the differences include higher household debt as well as more prudent lending conditions today. Also, some of the transactions in that period were investor driven and we have not experienced that to the same extent today,” he said.
The underlying economics and Market Drivers state that the market should be on fire, just like it was back in 2006 and 2007 – that is unless you begin to factor in these influencers, said Campbell.
“Let us make sure we are analyzing today’s markets with today’s conditions and not compare them to previous boom-bust cycles. Each cycle has its own influencers that either heat up or cool down a market and this current cycle from 2006 until today is the perfect proof of that,” he said.
“As long as the drivers are strong, the market is structurally strong, no matter what the influencers are doing. The concern should arise when the drivers are weak and the influencers are pushing the market upwards with no support. That is not what is happening in Alberta right now; in fact, the drivers remain strong despite the headlines.”
Ben Brunnen, chief economist with the Calgary Chamber of Commerce, said the province is definitely seeing all of the signs of strong economic and potentially housing growth.
“Net inter-provincial migration, population growth is up. Unemployment is low and GDP growth is relatively high,” said Brunnen. “I think we’re seeing probably a bit more of a cautious consumer out there. I do think we’ll see some strong real estate activity happening in Calgary but not like in the boom.
“I think there continues to be some caution in the market for a number of reasons. While Alberta’s economy is good, the global economy continues to be shaky, especially Europe and the United States. So people don’t have that strong confidence per se that this economic activity is going to be sufficiently robust that they should buy a house.”
Labels:
Alberta,
BOOM,
Calgary,
CREB,
Debt,
Demand,
Demographics,
Economy,
Edmonton,
GDP,
Inventory,
Job Growth,
MLS,
Population,
Real Estate
CHECK OUT THESE PIPES!
Canada new housing prices up 0.2 percent on strength in Calgary
Reporting by David Ljunggren; Editing by Theodore d'Afflisio
Thu Apr 11, 2013
OTTAWA (Reuters) - New home prices in Canada rose by 0.2 percent in February, the 23rd consecutive month-on-month increase, pushed up by a buoyant market in the western city of Calgary, Statistics Canada said on Thursday.
The advance matched analysts' expectations. Calgary prices rose 1.0 percent from January - the largest month-over-month increase since May 2007 - on higher material and labor costs. Calgary is the center of Canada's booming energy industry.
Overall, prices rose in 10 cities, stayed unchanged in nine and fell in two. On a year-over-year basis new housing prices in Canada rose by 2.1 percent in February, down from 2.2 percent in January.
The Canadian government, which imposed tighter mortgage rules last July, and the Bank of Canada have long expressed concerns the housing market might overheat.
The new housing price index excludes condominiums, which the government says are a particular cause for concern.
Photo by: Leo Reynolds
Labels:
2013,
Average Home Prices,
Calgary,
Canada,
Condominiums,
February,
January
Friday, April 5, 2013
WITHIN A HAIR
Resale home prices rise to near record
By Claire Young
Calgary Herald April 5, 2013
Fewer houses for sale and greater demand are pushing single-family resale housing prices up to near historical averages, says the Calgary Real Estate Board.
The average price rose to $518,392 in March, up 9.6 per cent from $472,698 during the same month last year.
This is within a hair of the new record of $518,500 for the average resale price for single-family homes logged in February, which beat the old high mark of $506,700 set in July 2007.
“Tighter rental conditions and continued employment growth has supported housing demand growth,” says chief economist Ann-Marie Lurie of CREB. “However, for those looking for more affordable single family home products, their choices continue to narrow.”
There were 3,194 new resale listings in Calgary in March, down almost five per cent compared to 3,348 during the same time last year.
For the first three months of 2013, the number of new listings was 8,358, down 4.6 per cent from 8,761.
“Less resale product available to consumers is ultimately limiting sales growth,” says CREB president Becky Walters in a news release. “In addition, resale homes are selling in less time and with continued upward pressure on prices.”
Listings of single-family resale homes in Calgary saw a year-over-year drop, declining to 2,239 in March, down 4.5 per cent from 2,346.
March’s benchmark price —that of a typical home based on a formula that uses various factors to ensure accurate comparisons — also rose to $446,500 in March, up 8.9 per cent from $411,000.
New listings of single-family homes under $500,000 are declining at double-digit rates, says Lurie. She predicts this will drive potential Calgary homebuyers to consider surrounding towns, condominiums or the new home market.
In Calgary, total sales of single-family homes dropped to 1,480 in March, down six per cent from 1,575.
The board’s Zone A, which is roughly the city’s northwest, saw 541 transactions at an average sale of $507,545 and 33 days on the market.
The two communities in the city that saw the most sales activity in March were both in Zone D, in the southeast.
Cranston and McKenzie Towne both logged 41 sales. The highest average sales were logged in the board’s Zone C in the southwest community of The Slopes, with two sales averaging $1.72 million.
OUT-OF-TOWN SALES DROP
Total MLS sales of resale homes in the communities surrounding Calgary dropped by two per cent in March compared to the same month last year, says the Calgary Real Estate Board.
Sales fell to 364, down from 372 sales, while new listings dropped significantly during this time to 662 in March, down 15.6 per cent from 785 last year.
But average prices rose to $365,002 in March, up 4.7 per cent from $348,474, says the board — and benchmark prices also increased to $336,100, up 7.1 per cent from $348,474.
The benchmark price is that of a typical home determined using various factors to ensure accurate comparisons.
Labels:
2013,
Ann-Marie Lurie,
Calgary,
CREB,
Homes,
MARCH,
Real Estate,
Single-Family Homes
Monday, April 1, 2013
Calgary resale housing market seeing price growth
One of few in Canada with more than 7% hike
By Mario Toneguzzi, Calgary Herald March 28, 2013
CALGARY — Calgary is one of only a handful of markets across Canada that has seen seven per cent and more year-over-year price growth for residential real estate, according to the Conference Board of Canada.In a resale housing survey of markets across the country for February, released Thursday, the board said the city, along with Regina, Saskatoon, Thunder Bay, Halifax and Newfoundland, experienced year-over-year price growth of seven per cent or more for the latest three months.
On a seasonally-adjusted annual rate, sales in Calgary of 25,416 are up 2.0 per cent in February from last year while listings have dropped by 5.1 per cent to 40,308.
The average sale price in Calgary was $438,412, up 6.1 per cent from February 2012.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)